Delivery review
Accept or reject each asset with a reason. The reason is recorded, because that is how the next order gets better.
A-01Approved
Unboxing and first fill, kitchen counter
Paid adsMeta, TikTok · 60 days · from 24 Sep 2026
Within the recorded term
grant recorded · 22 Sep 2026Ends: 2026-11-22
Accepted 21 Sep 2026. Recorded permission starts 24 Sep 2026.
A-02In review
Two week check in, no wilting
Paid adsMeta, TikTok · 60 days · from 24 Sep 2026
Within the recorded term · asset not accepted
grant recorded · 22 Sep 2026Ends: 2026-11-22
A-03Revision requested1 day late
Side by side with a standard pot
Revision requested, the hook needs the product in the first 3 seconds. The creator has 5 days from the revision request to resubmit.
Not grantedNo usage agreedNothing recorded for this asset
No grant recorded · asset not accepted
Do not run this asset. No usage has been agreed.
Why one asset shows no rights
The record has to be able to say an asset is not cleared.
A-03 was delivered, so it exists. The creator has not agreed to paid usage, so it is not cleared to run. Those are two separate facts and the interface keeps them separate. An empty column would have implied the question was never asked.